SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court of India has interpreted Article 356 to limit the imposition of President's Rule and ensure it is used only in specific circumstances.
DETAILS:
- Article 356 allows the President to assume control of a state government if the state is unable to function according to the Constitution.
- The Supreme Court has ruled that the imposition of President's Rule must be based on objective material and not arbitrary.
- In the case of S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994), the Court laid down guidelines for the imposition of President's Rule, emphasizing that it should be a last resort.
- The duration of President's Rule is limited to six months, but it can be extended with parliamentary approval.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If President's Rule is imposed without valid reasons, it can be challenged in the Supreme Court.
SOURCE:
- Article 356 of the Constitution of India, S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994)
Related Questions: