SHORT ANSWER:
Supreme Court judgments have clarified the conditions under which President's Rule can be imposed under Article 356, emphasizing the need to preserve democratic governance.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court has ruled that President's Rule should only be imposed in cases of constitutional breakdown and not for political reasons.
- The Court has established that the imposition of President's Rule must be based on objective criteria and not arbitrary decisions.
- Judicial review of the President's Rule has been upheld, ensuring accountability and adherence to democratic principles.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If President's Rule is imposed without valid reasons, it can be challenged in the Supreme Court, leading to its revocation.
SOURCE:
- Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, Supreme Court judgments.
Related Questions: