SHORT ANSWER:
The Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India case expanded the interpretation of Article 21 to include the right to live with dignity and personal liberty.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the right to life and personal liberty cannot be restricted except by a procedure established by law.
- It emphasized that any law must be fair, just, and reasonable.
- The case established that Article 21 is not just about the right to live, but also about the quality of life.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If laws infringe upon the right to life and personal liberty without due process, they may be struck down as unconstitutional.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 21
Related Questions: