SHORT ANSWER:
The Minerva Mills v. Union of India case expanded the interpretation of the basic structure doctrine by reinforcing that Parliament cannot alter or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court held that the basic structure doctrine is essential to maintain the supremacy of the Constitution.
- It emphasized that the fundamental rights and the directive principles of state policy are complementary and cannot be treated in isolation.
- The ruling asserted that any amendment that violates the basic structure is invalid.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Amendments that threaten the basic structure of the Constitution can be struck down by the Supreme Court.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgments
Related Questions: