SHORT ANSWER:
The Sr. Bommai case clarified the conditions under which President's Rule can be imposed in a state, impacting the relationship between state and central governments.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356 must be based on objective material and not arbitrary.
- It established that the state government has the right to challenge the imposition of President's Rule in court.
- This case emphasized the need for federalism and respect for state autonomy.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If President's Rule is imposed without valid reasons, it can be challenged in court, leading to potential reinstatement of the state government.
SOURCE:
- Article 356 of the Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgments.
Related Questions: