SHORT ANSWER:
The Sr. Bommai vs Union of India case clarified that the judiciary can review the imposition of President's Rule in a state to ensure it is not arbitrary.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court held that the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356 must be based on objective material and not merely on the subjective satisfaction of the President.
- The Court established that the judiciary has the power to examine the validity of the proclamation of President's Rule.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If found arbitrary, the imposition of President's Rule can be struck down by the judiciary.
SOURCE:
- Article 356 of the Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgement in Sr. Bommai vs Union of India (1994).
Related Questions: