SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court's interpretation of Article 356 in the S.R. Bommai case limited the arbitrary use of President's Rule by the central government, reinforcing the autonomy of state governments.
DETAILS:
- The court ruled that the imposition of President's Rule must be based on objective criteria and not merely on political considerations.
- It established that the state government has the right to challenge the imposition of President's Rule in court.
- The judgment emphasized that the central government should not misuse Article 356 to dismiss state governments.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If the central government misuses Article 356, it can face judicial review and potential reinstatement of the state government.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356, Supreme Court Judgment in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994).
Related Questions: