RuleMate India

SHORT ANSWER: The Supreme Court's judgment in the SR Bommai case limited the Governor's discretionary powers under Article 356 by establishing that the use of these powers must be based on objective material and not merely on the Governor's subjective opinion. DETAILS: - The court ruled that the Governor cannot act solely on his discretion; there must be a valid reason based on the ground realities. - It emphasized that the imposition of President's Rule should be based on the failure of the constitutional machinery and not on political considerations. - The judgment reinforced the need for the Governor to provide evidence before recommending President's Rule. PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable): - If the Governor acts beyond the constitutional limits, it can lead to judicial review and potential invalidation of the imposition of President's Rule. SOURCE: - Article 356 of the Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgment in SR Bommai case.