SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court's ruling on the NJAC declared it unconstitutional, reinforcing the judiciary's independence in judicial appointments.
DETAILS:
- The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was intended to give the executive more power in appointing judges.
- The Supreme Court ruled that the NJAC undermined the independence of the judiciary.
- This ruling restored the previous system where the judiciary had a significant role in the appointment of judges.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- The ruling prevents the executive from having a dominant role in judicial appointments, maintaining the separation of powers.
SOURCE:
- Supreme Court of India Judgment on NJAC Case
Related Questions: