SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court has clarified that the Governor's discretion under Article 356 must be exercised based on objective criteria and not arbitrarily.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court has ruled that the Governor should provide valid reasons for recommending President's Rule.
- The Court has emphasized that the Governor's decision should be based on the ground realities of the state.
- Judicial review is permissible to ensure that the Governor's discretion is not misused.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If the Governor acts arbitrarily, the Supreme Court can strike down the imposition of President's Rule.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356
Related Questions: