SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court's decision in Indira Sawhney v. Union of India established that Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution through amendments.
DETAILS:
- The case reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine, which limits Parliament's power to amend certain fundamental features of the Constitution.
- It emphasized that amendments should not violate the essential framework of democracy, federalism, and the rule of law.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Amendments that infringe upon the basic structure may be struck down by the judiciary.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgments
Related Questions: