SHORT ANSWER:
Yes, landmark judgments in India have cited public order, morality, and health to justify restrictions on fundamental rights.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court in the case of **K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)** emphasized that the right to privacy can be restricted for public order and health.
- In **Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)**, the court recognized the need for laws to protect women in the workplace, citing public morality and health.
- The **Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi (2009)** case addressed the issue of Section 377 IPC, highlighting the conflict between public morality and individual rights.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Restrictions based on these principles can lead to legal consequences for individuals or entities violating public order or morality.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgments
Related Questions: