SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court has intervened in the use of Article 356 in cases like S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994).
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the use of Article 356 (President's Rule) is subject to judicial review.
- It established that the imposition of President's Rule must be based on objective criteria and not arbitrary decisions.
- The judgment emphasized the importance of federalism and the autonomy of state governments.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If Article 356 is misused, it can be challenged in court, leading to reinstatement of the state government.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994)
Related Questions: