SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court has ruled that Article 356 should be used sparingly and only in cases of constitutional breakdown.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court in the case of S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994) laid down guidelines for the application of Article 356.
- It emphasized that the power under Article 356 is not absolute and must be exercised with caution.
- The Court stated that the Governor's report must be based on objective material and not merely on the subjective satisfaction of the Governor.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Misuse of Article 356 can lead to judicial review and potential reinstatement of the state government.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India, 1994.
Related Questions: