SHORT ANSWER:
The key principles established in the SR Bommai v. Union of India case include the need for objective assessment and the limitation of the Governor's discretion in the use of Article 356.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the Governor's discretion must be exercised based on objective criteria and not arbitrary decisions.
- The Court emphasized that the use of Article 356 (President's Rule) should be based on the failure of constitutional machinery and not on political considerations.
- The decision laid down guidelines for the Governor to follow when recommending the imposition of President's Rule.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Misuse of discretionary powers by the Governor can lead to judicial review and potential invalidation of the President's Rule.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; Supreme Court Judgement in SR Bommai v. Union of India (1994).
Related Questions: