SHORT ANSWER:
The Indian judiciary has intervened in the exercise of a governor's discretionary powers in cases like the S.R. Bommai case.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court in the S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994) case ruled that the governor's discretion must be exercised in accordance with the Constitution.
- The court laid down guidelines on the use of Article 356, which allows the imposition of President's Rule in states.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If the governor acts beyond the constitutional provisions, it can lead to judicial review and potential invalidation of the governor's actions.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356, Supreme Court Judgments.
Related Questions: