SHORT ANSWER:
The judiciary has checked the arbitrary use of Article 356 in cases like S.R. Bommai v. Union of India.
DETAILS:
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) established that the use of Article 356 must be based on objective material and not on arbitrary discretion.
- The Supreme Court laid down guidelines for the imposition of President's Rule, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the situation.
- The court ruled that the decision to impose President's Rule is justiciable and can be challenged in court.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If the imposition of Article 356 is found to be arbitrary, it can be struck down by the judiciary.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994.
Related Questions: