SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court has ruled that Article 356 must be used sparingly and only in cases of constitutional breakdown.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court in the case of S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994) laid down guidelines for the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356.
- The Court emphasized that the power should not be misused for political gains and should be based on objective criteria.
- It established that the decision to impose President's Rule must be subject to judicial review.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Misuse of Article 356 can lead to judicial intervention and restoration of the state government.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994)
Related Questions: