SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court has adjudicated several cases concerning Article 356, primarily focusing on its misuse and the limits of President's Rule.
DETAILS:
- Notable cases include S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) and Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006).
- The Supreme Court ruled that the imposition of President's Rule must be based on objective material and not arbitrary decisions.
- The Court emphasized that state governments should not be dismissed without valid reasons and that the legislative assembly must be restored as soon as possible.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- Misuse of Article 356 can lead to judicial review and reinstatement of state governments.
- The decisions have reinforced the principle of federalism and limited the arbitrary use of power by the central government.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; Supreme Court Judgments.
Related Questions: