🇮🇳

RuleMate India

Government rules made easy. Just ask.

SHORT ANSWER: The Supreme Court ruled that certain provisions of the 42nd Amendment were unconstitutional in the Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain case. DETAILS: - The case challenged the validity of the 42nd Amendment, particularly the provisions that curtailed judicial review and the power of the courts to examine the validity of amendments. - The Supreme Court held that the amendment violated the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable): - The ruling reaffirmed the power of the judiciary to review amendments that alter the basic structure of the Constitution. SOURCE: - Constitution of India, Supreme Court Judgments
✓ Clarifying Indian regulations through an educational lens.