SHORT ANSWER:
The key legal principles established by the Supreme Court in the S.R. Bommai case relate to the use of Article 356 of the Constitution regarding the imposition of President's Rule in states.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the power to impose President's Rule is not absolute and is subject to judicial review.
- It emphasized that the Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers and cannot act unilaterally.
- The Court laid down that the imposition of President's Rule must be based on material evidence and not on subjective satisfaction.
- The decision reinforced the importance of federalism and the autonomy of state governments.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If President's Rule is imposed without proper justification, it can be challenged in court and may be struck down.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356
Related Questions: