SHORT ANSWER:
The Supreme Court rulings have clarified the conditions under which a Governor can recommend President's Rule under Article 356 of the Constitution.
DETAILS:
- The Supreme Court has ruled that the Governor's discretion must be exercised based on the constitutional provisions and not on personal whims.
- Key cases include S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994), which established that the Governor's recommendation must be based on objective material and not arbitrary decisions.
- The court emphasized that the imposition of President's Rule should be a last resort and must be justified.
PUNISHMENT / IMPLICATIONS (if applicable):
- If the Governor acts beyond their constitutional powers, it can lead to judicial review and potential invalidation of the President's Rule.
SOURCE:
- Constitution of India, Article 356; S.R. Bommai vs. Union of India (1994)
Related Questions: